Response to George Berkeley’s Three Dialogues between Hylas and Philono

A Response to George Berkeleys Three Dialogues between Hylas and Philonous The following shew is a response to George Berkeleys Dialogues between Hylas and Philonous, in which he argues that the Cartesian capriciousness of substance is garbled, that the word matter as Descartes uses it, does not mean anything. This essay is also about words as memories, and about the two fabricated Marcels, young and old. Hylas is a Cartesian thinker, and Philonous is Berkeleys voice of reason. nomenclature ar like vesselsthey ar merely novel constructions of sounds empty of meaning until we cope with them. They mean only what we discern in them, and nothing more. Words are only our impressions of themimprecise, indefinite, unclear. A single word suggests infinite shades of persuasiveness or quality or connotation. They are variable, distinct in distributively era and dialect, even in each speaking. They are impossible to translate. Words are almost translations themselve s. They are re-creations of other words from other languages and from their own. They are metaphorsdead because they have been carried across into alien languages, and dead because we no long hear them. They are the memories of, and totallyusions to, what they at a time were. Words are instinctivethe aboriginal expression of thoughts secondary to thoughts. They are, indeed, the translations of thoughts, the inexact and practical interpretations of them. They communicate. Words are corrupt by nature. In the Dialogues between Hylas and Philonous, Berkeley knows words to be imperfect. His two speakers upset definitionsof skepticism, sensible things, substrata, matter, idea, spiritas principal points on which their arguments depend once Ph... ... Combray, Swann in Love, and Place-Names The Name, all of which are mentioned in the essays. Descartes Meditations on First school of thought questions and defines knowledge and existence. Descartes too, uses a first-person v oice, whom we called the Meditator. It is the Meditator who goes through the method of progressive doubt and re-founds all knowledge on the basis of the cogitoThus, after everything has been most carefully weighed, it must finally be established that I am, I exist is necessarily true every time I put it forward or conceive it in my mind. Berkeleys Dialogues between Hylas and Philonous is an argument between the Cartesian thinker Hylas and the Berkelean Philonous. In the first of these dialogues, Berkley argues that the Cartesian notion of substance is incoherent and that the word matter as Descartes uses it is meaningless.