'On Conflict Settlement Essay\r'

'Schick (1995) defines a participation as a â€Å"distinctive structure of desires and a be fraudf” (p. 58). A betrothal arises when an broker wants x and y wherein x and y are the only options avail qualified to the agent. accustomed this situation, an agent whitethorn get hold of to react in two ways. First, the agent may choose to vacate the conflict or second, the agent may choose to resolve the conflict. In the closure of a conflict, the agent starts to have in mind rationally by seizing to recollect that the options avail subject to him involves choosing some(prenominal) x and y or losing both x and y.\r\nIn this sense, the agent alters the resolution of the conflict through an internal mediation of his or her desires. The same thing applies when it comes to interpersonal conflict. The difference among the two merely lies in the existence of a particular situation wherein the desires and beliefs of two or more(prenominal) agents tend to counter that of the other. This shows the manner in which conflicts enable the â€Å"balancing of power” indoors an agent or within a group (Rummel, 1991, p. 76).\r\nThe balancing of powers resulting from the detail of a conflict enables the balancing of the following elements: interests, capabilities, and gives. Rummel (1991) logical arguments â€Å"conflict is a balancing of individual interests, capabilities, and wills. It is a simultaneous solution to the equations of power” (p. 77). Within an interpersonal conflict, it does not necessarily mean that the agent(s) whose beliefs and desires take precedence oer the other is the agent(s) who hold power within a group.\r\nThe balance of powers refers to the mutual satisfaction of the different and contending interests within a group. In other words, the balance of powers may be understood as the result of the mediation within an interpersonal conflict. In the previous presentation, angiotensin converting enzyme and only(a) of the g roups presented steps that may be followed in upshot a conflict arises. The steps that they provided involve the agent(s) emergence of self-awareness.\r\nThe importance of self-awareness here can be seen if one considers that it is only through the agent(s) identification of the clashing beliefs and desires that the agent(s) will be able to achieve the resolution of the conflict. This was shown by the group through a skit that they presented in class. matchless baron note that in the skit itself, the group was able to present that failure to develop awareness may lead to invasion which might further grow the conflict at hand.\r\nThe importance of this skit does not lie in its means of providing an example for those who were present; it to a fault enabled the audience’s direct experience of a conflict. Deutsch et al (2006) notes, â€Å"observing models deal effectively with hard-fought situations allows the observer to achieve greater freedom in coping with current and future problems of all sorts (p. 309). contempt of this, the group however, was unable to show that resolution and aggression are not the only means in which a conflict may end.\r\nMatthews and Roberts (2004) notes that conflicts may withal lead to â€Å"collaboration and appeals to authority” (p. 451). Although one might state that this also leads to the resolution of a conflict in the sense that it ends a conflict, it is important to note that conflicts that end in this manner further breeds the grounding of further disagreements amongst the agent(s) involved. Matthews and Roberts (2004) further notes that in the resolution of a conflict, there are certain skills which individuals should learn.\r\nThese involve â€Å" dynamic listening, assertiveness, expression of feelings in appropriate ways, empathy and perspective taking, cooperation, negotiation, and methods for countering prepossess” (p. 451). Although the group was unable to present all of these point, th ey were able to relay well the education that they had prepared for the presentation. In summary, given the time constraints on the group, I think the group was able to relay helpful information that will aid the members of the audience in the movement of understanding and handling situations that may lead to both personal and interpersonal conflict.\r\nReferences Deutsch, M. et al. (2006). The Handbook of Conflict gag law: Theory and Practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers. Matthews, G. & R. Roberts. (2004). Emotional Intelligence: recognition and Myth. Massachusetts: MIT Press. Rummel, R. (1991). The Conflict Helix. London: Transaction Publishers. Schick, F. (1997). make Choices: A Recasting of Decision Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.\r\n'