Facts

Relevant Facts Mario Echazabal began dallying at stripes crude refinery in 1972. In 1992, Mario employ to work directly for stripe at the same coker unit location. Mario was required to take a physical examination performed by Chevrons regional mendelevium. The doctor revealed that Marios liver was releasing certain enzymes at a higher than normal level. Ultimately, Chevron made the decision, lay out on the facts of the physician and the safe device of Mario that his liver would be in more danger if he was ex vexd to the noisome chemicals environ the coke plant in which he had utilize for. Thus, Mario keep to work for Chevron in his current position. Mario accordingly applied for the position again in 1995. Chevron, again told Mario they could not lease him for this position because of the risk that his liver would be change if he worked in the coker unit. Chevron thence wrote to Marios executive program to invite that Mario be removed from any areas with toxic exposures. Mario then filed lawsuit saying that Chevrons refusal to allow him to work in the coker unit was illegal discrimination under the Americans with Disabilities morsel (ADA) base on his disability, his diagnosed Hepatitis C. Chevron then argued it would cause a big(p) threat if Mario was to work in this position due to the harmful chemicals he would be ex outwitd to. The direct threat justification permits employers to impose a requirement that an individual shall not pose a direct threat to the health or safety of other individuals in the workplace. The Court found that Chevron acted responsibly when rescinding the job offer relying on their on site physicians recommendations. References Halbert, T., & Ingulli, E. (2012). Law & ethics in the business environment. Mason, OH: South-Western Pub.If you want to get a full essay, force-out it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

I f you want to get a full essay, visit our pa! ge: write my paper