Representation of Gays in Hollywood

During the production code, thither were very few representations of ethereal and lesbians on screen. The only few representations were filled with stereotypes and pretermited variety. People will call all(prenominal) other when they see a nonher gay person on TV. The bosh lines in movies featuring gays and lesbians were controlled and restricted. The whole invention was not often told in gay movies. Even after the code was lifted, Hollywood still struggled with their portrayal of gays, the high-flown sissies and the regular gays who were not as flamboyant. In todays movies, those issues atomic number 18 still prevalent. Gay scenes are laced with comedy and as a form of punishment.There are not enough genuine, authentic gay crawl in stories any more. The notion of visibility at any cause still exists today, possibly not as difficult as it was in the 30s. I am starting to believe that films do not creates stereotypes but rather the people behind these films. Directors, produ cers and even actors creates and perpetuate the stereotypes and feeds them to the audience. Simply changing the films alone(predicate) will not be enough to solve gay stereotypes in Hollywood. The change should start with the people making the films. Perhaps we need more gay directors or less stereotyping straight directors or better still directors with open minds.Fleming disagrees with Russos views on gay visibility in Hollywood. She is not as optimistic as Russo. Flemings point ab protrude the lack of lesbian perspective in Hollywood films was very interesting. But what stood out the most was the point she made about the dilemma of gays in Hollywood. If they release more visible, they open themselves up for ridicule but if they remain concealed then they are allow Hollywood to keep portraying them stereotypically. Overall, Fleming believes that there should be more range and diversity in gay story lines and I